The iWALK Crutch - A Total Game Changer.

It is generally understood that the incidence of developing a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is higher for patients with lower limb non-weight bearing injuries than for the general population (Saragas et al., 2014; Sullivan et al., 2019). For instance, the prevalence of DVT for patients after a foot and ankle surgery were reported to be as high as 32% (Saragas et al., 2014). The risk of DVT is a direct consequence of immobilization for prolonged periods of time due to the reduction in blood flow (Bleeker et al., 2004; Bradley et al., 2022; Ciufo et al., 2019) and muscle pump activity as was shown in various prior studies for both knee scooters and crutches (Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020). A published study comparing the blood flow and vessel dimensions after using the HFC, knee scooter and crutches found that unlike knee scooters and crutches, the HFC did not lead to statistically significant reductions in popliteal blood flow and vessel dimension when compared to unassisted normal walking (Bradley et al., 2022). In addition to this, the HFC leads to a heightened level of muscle activity in the injured limb explaining the increased blood flow observed using the HFC due to prior studies that have shown the influence muscle activity has on blood flow (Bradley & Hernandez, 2011; Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020; Reb et al., 2021). This result is impactful as it has been argued in prior studies that a flexed knee angle leads to increasing the risk of DVTs. For instance, subjects who sat for a prolonged period of time were shown to be more likely to develop a DVT according to one study (Kurosawa et al., 2022). Use of knee scooters, like sitting, fixes the knee angle to be approximately 90 degrees for a prolonged period of time. Another prior study argued that knee scooter users are more susceptible to developing a DVT due to the knee flexion (Ciufo et al., 2019). Furthermore, this study concluded that knee flexion had a direct impact on blood flow due to the reduction in blood flow observed using a knee scooter (Ciufo et al., 2019). However, these studies were limited in that it did not consider the decrease in muscle activity when both sitting as well as ambulating using the knee scooter. Like scooters, the HFC has a knee flexion angle that is approximately 90 degrees. However, unlike knee scooters and crutches, the HFC does not lead to a statistically significant reduction in blood flow and muscle activity (Bradley et al., 2022; Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020). This result shows that the negative effects of knee flexion can be mitigated with the HFC and that muscle activity has a greater impact on blood flow and reducing the risk of DVT than knee flexion.

A study published in Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics compared the blood flow and vessel dimensions following ambulation using the HFC, knee scooter and crutches for 40 participants (Bradley et al., 2022). This study found that the HFC led to a significantly lower decline in blood flow when compared to both knee scooters and crutches in popliteal blood flow and vessel dimension (Bradley et al., 2022). The results of this study corroborate the findings of other prior works which reported a significant decline in blood flow for knee scooters (Ciufo et al., 2019) with crutches leading to the greatest decrease (Reb et al., 2021). The increased blood flow observed with the HFC was attributed to the heightened muscle activity with the HFC in the suspended limb compared to both crutches and knee scooters (Bradley et al., 2022; Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020). This study along with other research have shown that muscle activity has a major impact on blood flow (Bradley et al., 2022; Bradley & Hernandez, 2011; Reb et al., 2021).

Reductions in blood flow is a major concern during a period of immobilization. Research shows that blood flow can be reduced by 61% after 8 hours of constant sitting (Kurosawa et al., 2022). When poor blood flow continues as a consequence of prolonged immobilization, it can present as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the lower extremities (Broderick et al., 2009; Faghri et al., 1997; McLachlin et al., 1960; Vinay et al., 2021) and cause pain, venous congestion and life-threatening pulmonary embolisms (PE) (Bradley et al., 2022). Reduced blood flow can also impact oxygen delivery to the injured muscle and bone which is important for healing (Lu et al., 2013). A fixed knee angle has been believed to have a direct impact on increasing the risk of developing a deep vein thrombosis in some prior studies (Bleeker et al., 2004; Ciufo et al., 2019). In particular, one study found that the flexed knee position during knee scooter use led to a significant reduction in blood flow (Ciufo et al., 2019). However, these aforementioned negative effects of knee flexion angle can be negated with the HFC due to the increased muscle activity in the suspended limb (Bradley et al., 2022; Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020). Moreover, these studies demonstrated that muscle activity in the suspended limb has a greater impact on blood flow than the knee flexion angle (Bradley et al., 2022; Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020) which is in agreement to another study which argued a similar conclusion (Reb et al., 2021) thereby changing the notion that knee flexion angle alone leads to developing a deep vein thrombosis. These findings are further supported by additional research that showed that the popliteal venous blood flow when using HFC was most similar to the blood flow that would be observed during normal unassisted walking, while popliteal venous blood flow of both crutches and knee scooters were impaired (Bradley et al., 2022).

Dr. Jason Wilken, a recognized expert in walking stability and falls in the Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science at the University of Iowa conducted a research study that directly compared the walking stability of both the HFC and crutches using the range of angular momentum as the outcome measure for both mobility devices with or without a walking boot (Wiederien et al., 2023). This study found that HFC users had a significantly lower range of whole-body angular momentum compared to crutch users in both conditions (Wiederien et al., 2023). The range of whole-angular momentum is crucial for balance control during human locomotion (Herr & Popovic, 2008). In particular, a larger range of whole-body angular momentum in the sagittal plane has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of falling and poor balance during gait in several prior studies (Bennett et al., 2010; Herr & Popovic, 2008; Nolasco et al., 2019; Nott et al., 2014; Pickle et al., 2017; Pickle et al., 2014; Robert et al., 2009; Sheehan et al., 2015; Silverman & Neptune, 2011; Silverman et al., 2014; Vistamehr et al., 2016). Based on aforementioned prior research that provides the direct impact angular momentum has on walking stability coupled with the recent study that has shown that the angular momentum is significantly greater using crutches compared to the HFC, this study proved that patients are at more risk of falling when using crutches than the HFC (Wiederien et al., 2023) which has been reported as a common concern with mobility device use (Hefflin et al., 2004).

Because the HFC recruits both legs and arms during locomotion similar to normal unassisted gait, this study also found that the HFC leads to an angular momentum pattern closest to normal unassisted gait that is sinusoidal with positive peaks corresponding to the rapid advancement of the swing limb of each limb (Wiederien et al., 2023). In contrast, crutches were shown to have a negative angular momentum the first half of the gait cycle and subsequently a large positive peak in the last half of the gait cycle as both limbs advance simultaneously (Wiederien et al., 2023). Such a significant difference in angular momentum patterns is associated with an increased risk of falling (Vistamehr et al., 2016).

This result corroborates other prior studies which showed that patients feel safer using the HFC (Rambani et al., 2007) and prefer the HFC over crutches (Martin et al., 2019). The result of this study is impactful as it relates to the overall safety of mobility device choices, and can guide medical providers during the prescription of an assistive device for patients who require to remain non-weight bearing due to a lower limb injury.

iWALK is preferred by 9 out of 10 patients which has implications in improving compliance, preventing complications and faster recovery.

The HFC is preferred by 86% of foot and ankle patients over crutches (Martin et al., 2019). This finding is consistent with other prior literature which report participants preffering the HFC over crutches (Wiederien et al., 2023). Patient satisfaction, safety and preference can be a major determinant for compliance to non-weight bearing recommendations (Bateni & Maki, 2005; Faruqui & Jaeblon, 2010; Martin et al., 2019; Wiederien et al.,2023 ) which is of paramount importance to achieving optimal results and prevent postoperative complications such as wound breakdown, loss of fracture fixation or hardware failure (Chiodo et al., 2016; Gershkovich et al., 2016). A recent student currently under review discovered that subjects preferred the HFC compared to both crutches and knee scooters in completing activities of daily life while knee scooters presented a clear limitation in environments that contain stairs or rough terrain. One other reason why the HFC is favorable among subjects compared to crutches may be explained by the lower exertion and pain scores the HFC provides as was reported in published studies (Hackney et al., 2022; Martin et al., 2019).

Allows hands free mobility with patients being able to do activities of daily living that can impact a patient’s wellbeing and improve compliance.

Unlike crutches and knee scooters, the HFC is a hand free mobility device. Thus, activities of daily living (ADLs and IADLs) that are impossible to do with crutches and knee scooters such as shopping, working, cooking, childcare, stairs, etc. are possible with the HFC. A randomized control trial with 80 patients with both upper and lower limb injuries showed that they were able to complete activities around the house using the HFC (Rambani et al., 2007) and patients had a more positive attitude to life due to the improved independence with the HFC (Barth et al., 2019). This is just one of the reasons why the HFC has a higher preference rating than crutches (Martin et al., 2019). Researchers Dr. Timmerman and Dr. Reidy at the Department of Kinesiology and Health of Miami University conducted a direct study that aimed to investigate the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) using a HFC compared to crutches and knee scooters. This study found that subjects preferred the HFC over both crutches and knee scooters during ambulation, stair climbing and activities of daily living while the knee scooter led to a clear disadvantage for stair climbing and on rough terrain. Furthermore, subjects found the HFC easier to use than crutches and knee scooters.

Increases compliance to non-weight bearing that can allow less complications and subsequently faster recovery.

The HFC improves patient compliance to non-weight bearing restrictions, due to prior research that shows that patients with lower limb injuries prefer a HFC over crutches and the important role patient preference plays on patient compliance (Martin et al., 2019). In addition to this, because patients are able to function independently using the HFC with the ability to do activities of daily living (Rambani et al., 2007), the HFC will lead to better compliance. A recent study showed that patients prefer the HFC over crutches and knee scooters when completing activities of daily living. Patients with lower extremity injuries have been known to be noncompliant with prescribed weight bearing restrictions while using crutches likely due to the pain, discomfort and limitations of performing activities of daily living (Chiodo et al., 2016; Gershkovich et al., 2016; Kubiak et al., 2013; Martin et al., 2019). However, lack of compliance can lead to secondary injuries and further complications such as wound breakdown, loss of fracture fixation or hardware failure (Gershkovich et al., 2016).

Increases muscle activity (which leads to decreased muscle atrophy, increased blood flow, and faster healing).

Research proves that the HFC provides statistically significant increases in muscle activity for the hip, quadriceps and calf muscles in the non-weight bearing leg with muscle activity patterns consistent with normal unassisted ambulation in terms of both intensity and activation per EMG recordings (Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020). On the other hand, crutches and knee scooters lead to statistically significant reductions in muscle activity in the non-weight bearing leg compared to normal unassisted ambulation as was shown in various prior studies (Clark et al., 2004; Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020; Sanders et al., 2018; Seynnes et al., 2008). The heightened level of muscle engagement in the non-weight bearing leg using the HFC compared to crutches has a direct impact on decreasing muscle atrophy, increasing blood flow, reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and enhancing healing (Bradley et al., 2022; Broderick et al., 2009; Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020; Faghri et al., 1997; Rasouli & Reed, 2020; Vinay et al., 2021). Each of these benefits of the heightened muscle activation using the HFC are supported with direct and associated studies in the following sections.

Decreases muscle atrophy.

The heightened recruitment of the muscles in the non-weight bearing leg when using the HFC compared to crutches decreases the level of disuse muscle atrophy (Altinkaynak, 2022; Bradley et al., 2022; Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020). Prior research shows that the degree a muscle will atrophy is dependent on the activity of the muscle (Clark, 2009; MacLennan et al., 2020; Magill et al., 2019; Sanders et al., 2018). This is further supported by prior research that shows a muscle fixed in a shorted position atrophies faster than if a muscle is fixed in a lengthened position (Booth, 1982; Booth & Gollnick, 1983). Thus, the knee flexion angle was shown to play an important role in muscle atrophy (Magill et al., 2019). Because the HFC fixes the knee angle at 90° flexion which lengthens the muscle, the muscle atrophy after a period of non-weight bearing is expected to be less compared to crutches that fixes the knee angle at approximately 30° (Altinkaynak, 2022). This could partially explain why crutches have been shown to have led to significant muscle atrophy with reductions in muscle size and strength as well as structural changes in muscle fibers in various prior studies (De Boer et al., 2008; Hather et al., 1992; Tesch et al., 2016).

Reduces the energy cost of ambulation that can allow patients to ambulate for longer durations and increase compliance.

There is a large body of research that have shown that crutches are attributed to significantly higher energy costs compared to normal unassisted ambulation (Dounis et al., 1980; Holder et al., 1993; Mcbeath et al., 1974; Nielsen et al., 1990; Sankarankutty et al., 1979; Thys et al., 1996). Increased physiological demand has been shown to be an important factor in discontinuance and noncompliance to weight bearing restrictions with crutch use (Bateni & Maki, 2005). Therefore, mobility devices designed to assist ambulation should keep energy expenditure to a minimum while still allowing normal walking speeds and the ability to do their activities of daily living.

A recent study published in the journal of Foot and Ankle Orthopedics compared the metabolic cost of ambulation using a portable metabolic analyzer for subjects using a HFC, crutches and knee scooter. This study found that the HFC led to substrate utilization most similar to normal unassisted gait with the least amount of aerobic energy while allowing one to use both hands for activities pertaining to daily life (Hackney et al., 2022). Similar to this study, another study was designed to measure the energy expenditure with a portable indirect calorimetry system for the HFC, knee scooter and crutches this time while completing activities that simulate tasks one would complete in daily life. The results of this study suggested that the HFC was the only mobility device that resulted in energy expenditure similar to normal walking while also allowing users to complete all tasks within the ADL course. Immediately after completing the ADL course subjects were asked how difficult they found ambulating with each assistive device using a Likert scale. The results of this data showed that subjects found using the HFC significantly easier than crutches which correlates with the lower energy expenditure measured using the HFC (Hackney et al., 2022) as well as the lower exertion reported for HFC user in other prior studies (Bhambani & Clarkson, 1989; Hackney et al., 2022; Martin et al., 2019).

Although crutches are the most prescribed assistive device (Kaye et al., 2000; Martin et al., 2019; Rambani et al., 2007), prolonged use of crutches have been shown to lead to various secondary injuries (Dalton et al., 2002; Manocha et al., 2021). Crutches lead to seven-fold increase in the force that runs through the axilla (Rambani et al., 2007). This increased force at the axilla has been shown to lead to secondary injuries such as axillary artery thrombosis (McFall et al., 2004; Tripp & Cook, 1998) and crutch palsy (Raikin & Froimson, 1997). Other complications as a result of crutch use are carpal tunnel syndrome (Gellman et al., 1988) and shoulder joint degeneration (Shabas & Scheiber, 1986). Because there is no loading of the hands and upper extremity when using a HFC, secondary injuries have not been reported with the HFC. Secondary injuries also occur with knee scooters due to the increased risk of falling (Rahman et al., 2020; Yeoh et al., 2017). The HFC also leads to better stability and a lower risk of falling compared to crutches (Wiederien et al., 2023). Due to this, HFC users are less susceptible to fall related injuries increasing the safety of mobility device users.

Reduces the structural plastic changes in gray matter and white matter after a period of non-weight bearing.

It is well accepted that limb immobilization effects human brain plasticity (Langer et al., 2012). In particular, it was shown that the cortical thickness (gray matter) of the sensorimotor cortex and fractional anisotropy (white matter) decreased after a period of immobilization which are both responsible for processing somatosensory information and impact motor movement (Langer et al., 2012). Because the HFC is the only mobility device that leads to muscle activity in the non-weight bearing limb consistent with normal walking when compared to crutches and knee scooters (Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020), the reorganization of the sensorimotor system as well as the overall effect of remaining non-weight bearing for prolonged periods on human brain plasticity is minimized with the HFC when compared to crutches and knee scooters.

A randomized control trial conducted using 80 patients showed that patients were discharged significantly faster after using a HFC compared with not using the HFC (Rambani et al., 2007). Reductions in muscle atrophy and improvement in blood flow when using a HFC impacts the total recovery time for lower limb injuries with quicker rehabilitation, faster healing and less cases of developing a deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (Bradley et al., 2022; Dewar et al., 2021; Dewar & Martin, 2020). The increased muscle oxygenation saturation using the HFC via improved blood flow also enhances healing (Lu et al., 2013). Crutches cause reductions in cross-sectional area of the quadriceps femoris muscle of about 0.4% per day (Clark et al., 2004). Because the HFC reduces muscle atrophy, the HFC leads to faster therapeutic gains. Moreover, secondary injuries as a result of using crutches or knee scooters falling (Rahman et al., 2020; Yeoh et al., 2017) are nonexistent when using a HFC in addition to the better stability compared to crutches which all contribute to reducing the recovery times of lower limb injuries (Wiederien et al., 2023).