For health professionals, patient compliance and satisfaction are key to successful outcomes. Yet, traditional crutches often discourage adherence due to discomfort and limitations on mobility. The iWALK hands-free crutch offers a clinically supported solution that empowers patients to maintain their independence, comfort, and confidence during recovery. In this guide, we explore strategies for introducing the iWALK to patients and maximizing their satisfaction and compliance with recovery protocols—backed by recent studies showing that hands-free crutches are not only preferred, but more effective in promoting adherence.
Understanding Patient Barriers to Compliance
Traditional crutches often present obstacles to compliance. Limited use of hands, strain on the upper body, and difficulty performing daily tasks can discourage patients from following non-weight-bearing instructions. This non-compliance not only jeopardizes recovery but can also lead to secondary injuries and complications such as wound breakdown, hardware failure, or loss of fixation (Gershkovich et al., 2016). Research has shown that patients using traditional crutches frequently deviate from prescribed restrictions due to these physical limitations (Chiodo et al., 2016; Kubiak et al., 2013; Martin et al., 2019).
The iWALK is designed to resolve these issues. It enables hands-free movement, supports a more natural posture, and allows patients to complete basic activities like cooking, shopping, or carrying items—all of which improve adherence to recovery plans (Canter et al., 2023; Rambani et al., 2007).
Introducing the iWALK: Setting Up for Success
When introducing a new mobility aid, especially one as unique as the iWALK, it’s important to guide patients with confidence and clarity. Some patients may be hesitant to try something unfamiliar, so a hands-on demonstration can help demystify the device. Walk patients through how to adjust the knee platform and straps for proper fit and balance. Encourage them to take small steps with supervision, gradually increasing their activity level.
Early comfort and success with the device are essential for long-term compliance—and research shows that when patients feel confident using a hands-free crutch, they are more likely to stick with it (Martin et al., 2019).
Addressing Common Patient Concerns
Patients may worry about balance, comfort, or safety with a hands-free device, particularly if they’ve only ever used crutches. Use the data to reassure them. In a clinical crossover trial, 86% of patients preferred the hands-free crutch over standard crutches, citing reduced fatigue and improved ability to perform activities of daily living (Martin et al., 2019). In another study, patients using hands-free crutches demonstrated lower heart rates, lower ratings of perceived exertion, and less physical strain while performing tasks like stair climbing and walking (Canter et al., 2023).
These outcomes suggest not only that patients feel better using iWALK—they’re actually working less hard to move. That reduction in physical demand contributes directly to better compliance.
Enhancing Comfort and Independence
The iWALK supports a hands-free, comfortable recovery experience that gives patients the freedom to manage tasks independently. This matters: one of the main reasons patients abandon crutches is that they prevent them from doing the simplest things, like making a cup of coffee or carrying a bag (Martin et al., 2019). By restoring this independence, iWALK doesn’t just support mobility—it empowers patients to actively participate in their own recovery.
Published studies confirm this benefit. In randomized controlled trials, patients overwhelmingly preferred hands-free crutches over traditional crutches and knee scooters for their ability to assist in daily function (Canter et al., 2023; Wiederien et al., 2023).
Monitoring and Follow-Up for Long-Term Success
A good start with iWALK should be followed by good support. Schedule follow-ups to make sure patients are using the device correctly, answer any questions, and adjust fit as needed. This kind of guidance ensures the iWALK continues to work for the patient as their recovery evolves—and keeps them motivated and compliant.
For patients facing longer recovery windows or managing chronic conditions, these follow-ups are especially important. The more supported a patient feels, the more likely they are to adhere to their mobility restrictions and complete their recovery with fewer complications.
Conclusion
The iWALK isn’t just a mobility aid—it’s a clinically validated tool that increases patient satisfaction, supports compliance, and reduces the physical and emotional burdens of recovery. Research shows that patients prefer it, perform better with it, and are more likely to follow their prescribed non-weight-bearing protocols because of it (Canter et al., 2023; Martin et al., 2019; Wiederien et al., 2023).
For health professionals looking to enhance patient outcomes, introducing the iWALK can make a measurable difference in how patients heal—and how they feel during the process.
References
Canter, D. J., Reidy, P. T., Finucan, T. P., & Timmerman, K. L. (2023). A comparison of energy expenditure and perceived exertion between standard axillary crutches, knee scooters, and a hands-free crutch. PM&R, 16(6), 543–552.
Chiodo, C. P., et al. (2016). Compliance with weight-bearing restrictions after foot and ankle surgery. Foot & Ankle International.
Gershkovich, G. E., et al. (2016). Weight-bearing noncompliance and associated complications after foot and ankle surgery. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery.
Kubiak, E. N., et al. (2013). Patient compliance with non-weight-bearing instructions after orthopaedic surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
Martin, K. D., et al. (2019). Patient preference and physical demand for hands-free single crutch vs standard axillary crutches in foot and ankle patients. Foot & Ankle International, 40(10), 1203–1208.
Rambani, R., Shahid, M. S., & Goyal, S. (2007). The use of a hands-free crutch in patients with musculoskeletal injuries: Randomized control trial. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 30(4), 357–359.
Wiederien, R. C., Gari, W. J., & Wilken, J. M. (2023). Effect of crutch and walking-boot use on whole-body angular momentum during gait. Assistive Technology.
