The Mobility Solution for Optimal Recovery
For physicians managing lower limb injuries requiring non-weight bearing recovery, ensuring patient compliance with mobility recommendations is critical for preventing postoperative complications and optimizing outcomes. Traditional crutches and knee scooters have been standard options for decades, but patient satisfaction data increasingly reveals their limitations—highlighting the need for improved solutions like the iWALK hands-free crutch.
The Clinical Shortcomings of Traditional Mobility Aids
While axillary crutches effectively offload weight from the injured limb, they require significant upper body strength and are associated with discomfort, fatigue, and secondary musculoskeletal pain in the wrists, shoulders, and hands. Knee scooters, while relieving upper body strain, introduce their own limitations: they remain cumbersome in tight indoor spaces, are impractical on stairs or uneven terrain, and promote a flexed-knee posture that may exacerbate muscle tightness or joint discomfort.
These factors reduce mobility, restrict independence, and risk patient non-compliance with non-weight bearing instructions, which can result in wound breakdown, loss of fracture fixation, or hardware failure.
Patient Preference and Evidence-Based Outcomes
Recent research indicates that the iWALK crutch is preferred by 86% of foot and ankle patients over crutches. This finding is consistent with other studies reporting that participants overwhelmingly favor the iWALK crutch compared to crutches. Preference is not merely a matter of comfort; patient satisfaction, safety, and perceived usability are major determinants for compliance with non-weight bearing protocols.
The iWALK crutch’s design enables patients to ambulate with a natural gait while keeping the injured leg fully offloaded. Its secure thigh and knee platform resembles a below-knee prosthesis, allowing hands-free mobility and upright posture, preventing compensatory movements that may lead to secondary injuries. Patients can perform activities of daily living independently, supporting psychological well-being and reducing caregiver burden.
Advantages Over Knee Scooters
Prior research demonstrates that patients prefer the iWALK crutch over both crutches and knee scooters for completing activities of daily life. Knee scooters present clear limitations in environments containing stairs or rough terrain. The inability to climb stairs or carry the scooter over steps was a primary reason subjects favored the iWALK crutch. This mobility freedom allows patients to remain active within safe guidelines, reducing risks of muscle atrophy and deconditioning during recovery.
Reduced Physiological Burden and Improved Comfort
Studies also reveal that compared to crutches, the iWALK crutch results in lower exertion levels, reduced heart rate, decreased energy expenditure, and lower pain scores. These physiological benefits translate to improved tolerance for daily mobility requirements, enhancing compliance and patient-reported satisfaction.
Conclusion
As a physician, your goal is to ensure that patients recover efficiently, safely, and with the least possible disruption to their quality of life. Traditional crutches and knee scooters carry significant limitations that can hinder compliance and delay rehabilitation. Evidence shows that patients prefer the iWALK crutch nine times out of ten, due to its superior comfort, reduced exertion, hands-free functionality, and ability to navigate diverse environments.
Recommending the iWALK crutch to eligible patients promotes better outcomes by ensuring adherence to non-weight bearing protocols, preventing postoperative complications, and supporting independence during recovery. By integrating the iWALK crutch into your standard of care, you provide patients with an evidence-based mobility solution that aligns with their needs and enhances their healing journey.